Stewart is Sublime in Goold's Gory Show. It is always difficult to return to a play when your last experience of it was truly horrendous: such is the case with Macbeth. So despondent was I by the last local production I viewed I approached this newly modernised version, starring Patrick Stewart and directed by Rupert Goold, with trepidation. However thankfully, here is the perfect imagining of Shakespeare’s classic tragedy to convert me back to a lover of this gory tale. Goold’s 2. 01. 0 film- -based on his 2. I have seen before; it is modern, fast and incredibly bloody, leaving me surprised that it only warranted a 1. Set in an undefined and threatening central European world which serves to make the action even more unsettling, the viewer is left to wonder about where the action is actually taking place which similarly adds to the sense of claustrophobia as we see endless stretches of corridors filled by the witches, industrial grime and sinister, darkened rooms. Additionally, there are also no references to time frame, leaving the viewer at even more of a loss. Stewart is one of the greatest Shakespearean actors ever and plays the lead role with great subtlety and vulnerability, which in the early stages of the film lead me to believe his Macbeth was not capable of the murders that follow. Stewart is likeable and seemingly not naturally bloodthirsty in the role, his motivation coming from Kate Fleetwood’s fascinating portrayal of Lady Macbeth. She is watchable with her pale skin, startling looks and tense limbs, if a little guilty of overplaying her descent into madness. However she is highly competent in the role of wife to the protoagonist. In contrast, Stewart is wonderfully understated, his greed and fear tinged with a private desperation, while his wife serves to encourage these weaknesses: in many ways she provides the backbone Stewart’s Macbeth sometimes appears to lack. Free Essays on Tragedy of Tragic Macbeth. William Shakespeare's tragedy, Macbeth. Charles Lamb in On the Tragedies of Shakespeare explains the impact of Macbeth's initial murder: The state of sublime emotion. Verdi and Shakespeare: MACBETH. MACBETH is Shakespeare’s shortest tragedy; nevertheless it is dense with metaphor and imagery. Macbeth, Shakespeare’s Sublime Tragedy (1908) American B&W : One reel / 835 feet Directed by William V. Ranous, Miss Carver ( The camerawork is also significant. In Stewart’s integral “Is this a dagger I see before me?” speech we see these lines spoken in one prolonged take, demonstrating amply how Stewart requires no assisting, no distracting special effects or props, simply one steady angle and those immortal words. In contrast the portrayal of the witches and other minor characters are where this production thrives in the “modernisation” category. Camerawork is jerky, uncomfortable and dramatic, the witches' guise as nurses offers many excuses for the extensive use of blood (and dead bodies aplenty too). The Garrick version also omitted Lady Macbeth's. If William Shakespeare’s ascendancy over Western theatre has not. His instruction that she “should not sing at all” is echoed in Ernest Bloch ’s Macbeth. From the outset they are disturbing, almost otherworldly despite their medical costuming. Their chants of “All hail Macbeth, hail to thee – Thane of Cawdor!” resemble those of the Greek chorus and set the dark tone that pervades the entire production. And it is this darkness that provides my one complaint. The actors are faultless in the roles they portray, and I happily accept Macbeth is one of the more gory plays I could wish to watch but is there really need for a gun, riffle or World of War Craft moment in every other scene? Perhaps I’m too delicate for this sinister Macbeth business? All in all though, this is a stunning production of Shakespeare’s classic, the technical aspects matching the skills of the well- chosen cast. Perhaps the most impressive scene is that of the royal banquet, not only exquisitely directed in Macbeth’s vision of Banquo (Martin Turner) standing, bloody faced on the dining table and franticly dancing, but enhanced by the engrossing dynamic between Macbeth and Lady Macbeth and topped off by the fittingly grand costuming. The scene is the embodiment of why Goold’s production is so chillingly brilliant and a must for a lover of the Bard.. Watch the performance online here. An introduction to Shakespearean Tragedy. Despite their dazzling diversity, the tragedies of Shakespeare gain their enduring power from a shared dramatic vision, argues Kiernan Ryan. That core list of nine can be expanded to twelve, however, if we include the history plays. Richard IIIand Richard II, both of which were also billed as tragedies in Shakespeare’s day, and Timon of Athens, whose claim to inclusion is more questionable, but which is listed as one of the tragedies on the contents page (the . So, for that matter, is Cymbeline, though no one could make a credible case for its belonging there, when it plainly belongs with the late romances – Pericles, The Winter’s Tale and The Tempest – with which it’s long been grouped. Troilus and Cressida, on the other hand, despite being advertised in an earlier edition as a first- rate comedy, is also entitled a tragedy in the First Folio, but not listed at all in the Catalogue and placed ambiguously – as befits its unclassifiable nature – between the histories and the tragedies. The more one ponders the question of what qualifies as a Shakespearean tragedy, the more complicated it can become. So modern studies of Shakespeare’s tragedies tend to focus on the plays whose right to the title is undisputed, and treat each one separately as a self- contained tragedy, leaving the question of what unites them unaddressed or unresolved. There’s a lot to be said for approaching each tragedy first and foremost as a unique work of dramatic art in its own right. And the temptation to boil them all down to the same generic formula should obviously be resisted. But it would be equally misguided to rule out the possibility of identifying what the tragedies have in common without dissolving the differences between them. For that would mean denying the strong sense most people have, when watching or reading these plays, that there’s something distinctively Shakespearean about their tragic vision that sets them apart from other kinds of tragedy. Photograph of Orson Welles and Arthur Anderson in Julius Caesar. The tent scene in the 1. Orson Welles’s Julius Caesar: The Death of a Dictator. View images from this item (1)Copyright: ? The detailed answer that question demands is beyond the scope of this brief introduction. But the basic points of the argument it would entail can be outlined here, and my articles on Hamlet, Othello, King Lear and Macbethshould go some way towards fleshing them out. The key point should become clear if we turn to one of Shakespeare’s earliest tragedies, Romeo and Juliet. Shakespeare’s immortal couple have become a global byword for lovers driven unjustly to their doom because they belong to warring factions that refuse to tolerate their love. During the last four centuries the play has inspired countless adaptations and offshoots on stage and screen, as well as operas, symphonies, fiction, poetry and paintings. But Romeo and Juliet couldn’t have acquired its enduring resonance, if the significance and value of the tragedy were trapped in the time when Shakespeare wrote it. If the play made sense and mattered only in terms of that time, it wouldn’t be able to reach across the centuries and speak with such urgency to so many different cultures now. That Romeo and Juliet is rooted in the age of Shakespeare, and can’t be fully understood without some knowledge of the world it sprang from, hardly needs demonstrating. But no critical account or production can do justice to Romeo and Juliet, if it’s not alert to the ways in which it was far ahead of Shakespeare’s time and is still far ahead of ours too. Photographs of a Syrian Romeo and Juliet, 2. The Gothic in Macbeth – Shakespeare’s radical tragedy. The Gothic in Macbeth – Shakespeare’s radical tragedy.A 1. 2- year- old Syrian refugee in Jordan, Ibrahim, plays a Romeo separated from his Juliet by the current conflict in the Middle East. View images from this item (5)Copyright: . It is natural that he should conform to the circumstances of his day, but a true genius will stand independent of those circumstances.’ . These are some of his notes on Othello. View images from this item (1. The love that Romeo and Juliet discover may be fleeting, but it’s a new kind of love that propels them beyond the horizon of Shakespeare’s world and remains an inspiring ideal in our own. Romeo’s infatuation with Rosaline had been rightly mocked by Mercutio as the same old Petrarchan scenario of submissive male tormented by unrequited love for an unattainable mistress. But Mercutio’s remedy for Romeo’s clich. Both scenarios lock both parties into an unequal relationship that subordinates one of them to the will of the other. But the relationship of Romeo and Juliet is based on reciprocity rather than subservience. As the Chorus tells us: . Above all, their love is mutually enhancing and limitless. In Juliet’s wonderful words: . Thus the tragic fate of Romeo and Juliet’s . It’s long been recognised that the play vindicates the individual’s right to love whoever they choose to love, unconstrained by irrational prohibitions or mindless prejudice. But Romeo and Juliet goes further than that. It envisions, and finds the words to describe, a bond of love uncontaminated by the urge to use and dominate. Photograph of a Palestinian- Israeli Romeo and Juliet, 1. Khalifa Natour (Romeo) and Orna Katz (Juliet) share a dangerous kiss. View images from this item (1)Copyright: . Romeo and Juliet turn out to have been citizens of truly civilized centuries to come, who reveal the potential to lead more fulfilling lives than those they have been forced to lose by the barbaric age in which they are marooned. The same strikes me as true, in one way or another, of all Shakespeare’s great tragic protagonists. In spite of their capacity to embrace an entirely different destiny, they are overpowered by the constraints of the era they have the misfortune to inhabit rather than by some malign metaphysical force or some unfortunate flaw in their character. Romeo may believe himself to be the victim of . But their real tragedy is to find themselves stranded and fated to die in a hostile, alien reality, far from the transfigured future their tragic plight foreshadows. Think of Othello. A black man from Africa and an upper- class white woman from Venice fall in love and elope, undaunted by the hostility their interracial marriage inevitably incurs. Othello and Desdemona act, with a sublime utopian naivety the play invites us to admire, as if they already dwelt in a world of which we in the 2. Instead they attract, in the shape of Iago, the lethal hatred of a racially prejudiced, patriarchal society, whose foundations their love threatens to undermine. Or think of Antony and Cleopatra, that peerless ! Here is my space, / Kingdoms are clay’ (1. So, like Romeo and Juliet, they are left with no option but to take their own lives in order to find forever in death the transcendent union denied them in life. Photograph of Joanna Vanderham and Hugh Quarshie in Othello, 2. Johanna Vanderham (Desdemona) holds a despairing Hugh Quarshie (Othello). View images from this item (1)Shakespearean tragedy. It’s not difficult to see how Shakespeare’s tragedies of love – Romeo and Juliet, Othello and Antony and Cleopatra – were written from an imaginative standpoint ahead of their time. The heart- breaking conflict between what human beings need to be, deserve to be and could be, and what the time and place they live in condemn them to become, could scarcely be clearer than it is in these plays. Shakespeare makes it equally plain that there’s nothing to stop human beings putting an end to such tragedies by changing the world that produced them and changing themselves in the process. His creation of characters who can’t come to terms with their world reveals the capacity of human beings to be radically different from the way their world expects them to be. So, although these particular characters end up defeated by the intolerable predicament in which they are trapped, the predicament itself is shown by them to be the product of a society whose authority can be resisted and contested. The way things had to be for them, as they prove at the cost of their lives, is not the way they should be, and not the way they have to go on being. Once one understands that, it’s much easier to see what the other tragedies have in common with the tragedies of love, and what’s characteristically Shakespearean about them too. Shakespeare’s tragic protagonists, the fictional universes they inhabit, and the tragic fates that await them are amazingly diverse. But every one of his tragic protagonists is doomed by having been cast in the wrong role in the wrong place in the wrong time. Every one of them becomes a stranger in a world where they had once felt at home, and a stranger to the person that they used to be or thought they were. And in the process, every one of them reveals the potential they possess to be another kind of person in another kind of world, which they will tragically never live to see. Copyright: . Or King Lear: forced to feel what the . Or Macbeth: the noble warlord who murders a fellow human being for his crown, is tortured by guilt as a consequence, and winds up butchering his way to oblivion, in spite of being, as his own wife attests, . Or Richard II: the dethroned monarch, who learns too late, like Lear, that the king was just the role he chanced to play, and who realises that without the trappings of majesty he is . Or Timon of Athens: transformed by the ingratitude of his friends into an implacable misanthrope, so disenchanted with humanity that, like Richard II, he finds fulfilment only in the annihilation death will bring: . Nor is it that surprising, since they are the creations of a dramatist who was himself a child of the future, and who remains to this day, four centuries after his death, . He is the author of Shakespeare (3rd edition, 2. Shakespeare’s Comedies (2. Shakespeare’s Universality: Here’s Fine Revolution (2. Introduction to the Penguin Classics edition of King Lear (2. His next book, Shakespearean Tragedy, will be published by Bloomsbury in 2.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
January 2017
Categories |